| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Le Skunk
Privateers
Privateer Alliance
   |
Posted - 2007.05.13 15:58:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 13/05/2007 15:57:21
 Originally by: Selena 001
Originally by: Ha'Uler
Suicide ganking has already changed on the testserver. CONCORD now instantly kills drones and deals much, much more damage. Fully tanked Domis survive for only four seconds, tops.
All its doing is making it cost you slightly more to suicide stuff. Not dealing with the actual problem.
PvP in empire was intended to be reserved for wars (not the pointless war-mongering the Privateers were taking advantage of either btw) otherwise, whats the point in allowing wars and creating concord? 
The 'pointless war mongering' never existed. Every war had a point be it resource hoggins/ space denial/ smack talk/ ore thiefing/ loot thiefing/ defence of a smaller corp/ economic 'black ops'.
Any'pointless war mongering' is now continued by myriad smaller corps - who pick on the smallest and most helpless - instead of the Largest and most powerful like we did.
SKUNK
Oh and signed to the OP. You are however - doomed. The anti freighter gankers are following my "9 points to nerfdoom" and are well on the way to success.
|
Le Skunk
Privateers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.13 16:28:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 13/05/2007 16:26:37
Originally by: Aphotic Raven
Originally by: Willow Whisp
/signed. CCP finally Fixed the Freighter so it works as intended, and people that have been abusing a bug that caused the freighter to basically give them invulnerability in highsec are whining. Thank you, CCP, for finally fixing the bug.
Re: Loss of insurance to Concord. I fully Agree. I don't see why a pilot that took a t2 piħata through highsec unescorted basically inviting aggression should get any kind of insurance. That kind of piloting is irresponsible.
Oh, you meant the attacker? 
Agreed... Insurance shouldnt cover suicide attacks... its not in the contract... lets see the carebears ***** and moan then.
I think this would be a BAD idea. People oft quote REAL LIFE insurance companys not paying you if you ramraid your car into a supermarket.
Well this is true. But if you want to do that
1) No insurance for self destructs
2) No insurance for gross negligence in a mission
3) If you live in lowsec - massive premiums
4) If you die in 0.0 - no insurance offered
5) The more ships you lose - the more they charge you.
6) Noobs uninsurable
7) No insurance for "act of CCP" (lag)
SKUNK
|
Le Skunk
Privateers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.13 21:58:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 13/05/2007 21:56:34
Originally by: Mirirar
Insurance should be changed so it does not pay out if Concord is involved.
It should also up your "rates". :)
I would agree as long as any ships destroyed in 0.0 did not recieve an insurance payout.
After all - following the real life analogy used to justify no insurance to suicide gankers - no insurance company would ever pay out if you deliberatly drove your car in a war torn country and got shot at.
If your gonna nerf empire - you REALLY gotta make 0.0 harsher.
Never happen though.
SKUNK
|
| |
|